drm/i915: Reorder semaphore deadlock check
If a semaphore is waiting on another ring, which in turn happens to be
waiting on the first ring, but that second semaphore has been signalled,
we will be able to kick the second ring and so can treat the first ring
as a valid WAIT and not as HUNG.
v2: Be paranoid and cap the potential recursion depth whilst visiting
the semaphore signallers. (Mika)
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54226
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75502
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index cf288a9..69aaa11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2847,10 +2847,14 @@
struct intel_engine_cs *signaller;
u32 seqno, ctl;
- ring->hangcheck.deadlock = true;
+ ring->hangcheck.deadlock++;
signaller = semaphore_waits_for(ring, &seqno);
- if (signaller == NULL || signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
+ if (signaller == NULL)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* Prevent pathological recursion due to driver bugs */
+ if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock >= I915_NUM_RINGS)
return -1;
/* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
@@ -2858,7 +2862,13 @@
if (ctl & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE && semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
return -1;
- return i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno);
+ if (i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
}
static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -2867,7 +2877,7 @@
int i;
for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
- ring->hangcheck.deadlock = false;
+ ring->hangcheck.deadlock = 0;
}
static enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action