mm, oom: pass an oom order of -1 when triggered by sysrq
The force_kill member of struct oom_control isn't needed if an order of -1
is used instead. This is the same as order == -1 in struct
compact_control which requires full memory compaction.
This patch introduces no functional change.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index ed3e258..95b330a 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -358,8 +358,7 @@
.zonelist = node_zonelist(first_memory_node, gfp_mask),
.nodemask = NULL,
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
- .order = 0,
- .force_kill = true,
+ .order = -1,
};
mutex_lock(&oom_lock);