[MTD] NAND Replace oobinfo by ecclayout
The nand_oobinfo structure is not fitting the newer error correction
demands anymore. Replace it by struct nand_ecclayout and fixup the users
all over the place. Keep the nand_oobinfo based ioctl for user space
compability reasons.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 20f79fe..e922b82 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -52,28 +52,33 @@
#endif
/* Define default oob placement schemes for large and small page devices */
-static struct nand_oobinfo nand_oob_8 = {
- .useecc = MTD_NANDECC_AUTOPLACE,
+static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_8 = {
.eccbytes = 3,
.eccpos = {0, 1, 2},
- .oobfree = {{3, 2}, {6, 2}}
+ .oobfree = {
+ {.offset = 3,
+ .length = 2},
+ {.offset = 6,
+ .length = 2}}
};
-static struct nand_oobinfo nand_oob_16 = {
- .useecc = MTD_NANDECC_AUTOPLACE,
+static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_16 = {
.eccbytes = 6,
.eccpos = {0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7},
- .oobfree = {{8, 8}}
+ .oobfree = {
+ {.offset = 8,
+ . length = 8}}
};
-static struct nand_oobinfo nand_oob_64 = {
- .useecc = MTD_NANDECC_AUTOPLACE,
+static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_64 = {
.eccbytes = 24,
.eccpos = {
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63},
- .oobfree = {{2, 38}}
+ .oobfree = {
+ {.offset = 2,
+ .length = 38}}
};
/* This is used for padding purposes in nand_write_oob */
@@ -749,7 +754,7 @@
uint8_t *p = buf;
uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->buffers.ecccalc;
uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->buffers.ecccode;
- int *eccpos = chip->autooob->eccpos;
+ int *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
chip->read_buf(mtd, buf, mtd->writesize);
chip->read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
@@ -795,7 +800,7 @@
uint8_t *p = buf;
uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->buffers.ecccalc;
uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->buffers.ecccode;
- int *eccpos = chip->autooob->eccpos;
+ int *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
chip->ecc.hwctl(mtd, NAND_ECC_READ);
@@ -1198,7 +1203,7 @@
int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->buffers.ecccalc;
const uint8_t *p = buf;
- int *eccpos = chip->autooob->eccpos;
+ int *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
if (chip->ecc.mode != NAND_ECC_NONE) {
/* Software ecc calculation */
@@ -1227,7 +1232,7 @@
int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
uint8_t *ecc_calc = chip->buffers.ecccalc;
const uint8_t *p = buf;
- int *eccpos = chip->autooob->eccpos;
+ int *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
chip->ecc.hwctl(mtd, NAND_ECC_WRITE);
@@ -2124,16 +2129,16 @@
/*
* If no default placement scheme is given, select an appropriate one
*/
- if (!chip->autooob) {
+ if (!chip->ecc.layout) {
switch (mtd->oobsize) {
case 8:
- chip->autooob = &nand_oob_8;
+ chip->ecc.layout = &nand_oob_8;
break;
case 16:
- chip->autooob = &nand_oob_16;
+ chip->ecc.layout = &nand_oob_16;
break;
case 64:
- chip->autooob = &nand_oob_64;
+ chip->ecc.layout = &nand_oob_64;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING "No oob scheme defined for "
@@ -2198,6 +2203,15 @@
}
/*
+ * The number of bytes available for a client to place data into
+ * the out of band area
+ */
+ chip->ecc.layout->oobavail = 0;
+ for (i = 0; chip->ecc.layout->oobfree[i].length; i++)
+ chip->ecc.layout->oobavail +=
+ chip->ecc.layout->oobfree[i].length;
+
+ /*
* Set the number of read / write steps for one page depending on ECC
* mode
*/
@@ -2236,8 +2250,8 @@
mtd->block_isbad = nand_block_isbad;
mtd->block_markbad = nand_block_markbad;
- /* and make the autooob the default one */
- mtd->oobinfo = chip->autooob;
+ /* propagate ecc.layout to mtd_info */
+ mtd->ecclayout = chip->ecc.layout;
/* Check, if we should skip the bad block table scan */
if (chip->options & NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN)