coredump: set ->group_exit_code for other CLONE_VM tasks too
User visible change.
do_coredump() kills all threads which share the same ->mm but only the
coredumping process gets the proper exit_code. Other tasks which share
the same ->mm die "silently" and return status == 0 to parent.
This is historical behaviour, not actually a bug. But I think Frank
Heckenbach rightly dislikes the current behaviour. Simple test-case:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
int main(void)
{
int stat;
if (!fork()) {
if (!vfork())
kill(getpid(), SIGQUIT);
}
wait(&stat);
printf("stat=%x\n", stat);
return 0;
}
Before this patch it prints "stat=0" despite the fact the child was killed
by SIGQUIT. After this patch the output is "stat=3" which obviously makes
more sense.
Even with this patch, only the task which originates the coredumping gets
"|= 0x80" if the core was actually dumped, but at least the coredumping
signal is visible to do_wait/etc.
Reported-by: Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenbach@fh-soft.de>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 89d4080..829a6c6 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1561,12 +1561,13 @@
return ispipe;
}
-static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start)
+static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
{
struct task_struct *t;
int nr = 0;
start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
+ start->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
t = start;
@@ -1591,8 +1592,7 @@
spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (!signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
mm->core_state = core_state;
- tsk->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
- nr = zap_process(tsk);
+ nr = zap_process(tsk, exit_code);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
if (unlikely(nr < 0))
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@
if (p->mm) {
if (unlikely(p->mm == mm)) {
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
- nr += zap_process(p);
+ nr += zap_process(p, exit_code);
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
}
break;