OProfile: moving increment_tail() in buffer_sync.c
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: oprofile-list <oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Barry Kasindorf <barry.kasindorf@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
index 69a73277..615929f 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
@@ -268,6 +268,17 @@
return cookie;
}
+static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
+{
+ unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
+
+ rmb();
+
+ if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
+ b->tail_pos = new_tail;
+ else
+ b->tail_pos = 0;
+}
static unsigned long last_cookie = INVALID_COOKIE;
@@ -417,19 +428,6 @@
}
-static void increment_tail(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *b)
-{
- unsigned long new_tail = b->tail_pos + 1;
-
- rmb();
-
- if (new_tail < b->buffer_size)
- b->tail_pos = new_tail;
- else
- b->tail_pos = 0;
-}
-
-
/* Move tasks along towards death. Any tasks on dead_tasks
* will definitely have no remaining references in any
* CPU buffers at this point, because we use two lists,