tree e06a7c18e840745869ffa72d568d4c125c7e3fb4
parent 137ee20ddd10fdc20600c389fe63edab0c39cb1a
author Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 1300218669 +0100
committer Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 1300218669 +0100

perf probe: Clean up probe_point_lazy_walker() return value

Newer compilers (gcc 4.6) complains about:

        return ret < 0 ?: 0;

For the following reason:

  util/probe-finder.c: In function ‘probe_point_lazy_walker’:
  util/probe-finder.c:1331:18: error: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ‘true’, suggest explicit middle operand [-Werror=parentheses]

And indeed the return value is a somewhat obscure (but correct) value
of 'true', so return 'ret' instead - this is cleaner and unconfuses
GCC as well.

Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>