libata: retry failed FLUSH if device didn't fail it
If ATA device failed FLUSH, it means that the device failed to write
out some amount of data and the error needs to be reported to upper
layers. As retries can't recover the lost data, FLUSH failures need to
be reported immediately in general.
However, if FLUSH fails due to transmission errors, the FLUSH needs to
be retried; otherwise, filesystems may switch to RO mode and/or raid
array may drop a drive for a random transmission glitch.
This condition can be rather easily reproduced on certain ahci
controllers which go through a PHY event after powersave mode switch +
ext4 combination. Powersave mode switch is often closely followed by
flush from the filesystem failing the FLUSH with ATA bus error which
makes the filesystem code believe that data is lost and drop to RO
mode. This was reported in the following bugzilla bug.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14543
This patch makes libata EH retry FLUSH if it wasn't failed by the
device.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Andrey Vihrov <andrey.vihrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 8769864..ba07e84 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
/* This should match the actual table size of
* ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table in libata-eh.c.
*/
- ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 5,
+ ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 6,
/* Horkage types. May be set by libata or controller on drives
(some horkage may be drive/controller pair dependant */