[PATCH] list: use list_replace_init() instead of list_splice_init()
list_splice_init(list, head) does unneeded job if it is known that
list_empty(head) == 1. We can use list_replace_init() instead.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index ab39fe1..195a5e9 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2980,7 +2980,7 @@
static DEFINE_MUTEX(net_todo_run_mutex);
void netdev_run_todo(void)
{
- struct list_head list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(list);
+ struct list_head list;
/* Need to guard against multiple cpu's getting out of order. */
mutex_lock(&net_todo_run_mutex);
@@ -2995,9 +2995,9 @@
/* Snapshot list, allow later requests */
spin_lock(&net_todo_list_lock);
- list_splice_init(&net_todo_list, &list);
+ list_replace_init(&net_todo_list, &list);
spin_unlock(&net_todo_list_lock);
-
+
while (!list_empty(&list)) {
struct net_device *dev
= list_entry(list.next, struct net_device, todo_list);