[PATCH] list: use list_replace_init() instead of list_splice_init()
list_splice_init(list, head) does unneeded job if it is known that
list_empty(head) == 1. We can use list_replace_init() instead.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/net/core/link_watch.c b/net/core/link_watch.c
index 646937c..0f37266 100644
--- a/net/core/link_watch.c
+++ b/net/core/link_watch.c
@@ -91,11 +91,10 @@
/* Must be called with the rtnl semaphore held */
void linkwatch_run_queue(void)
{
- LIST_HEAD(head);
- struct list_head *n, *next;
+ struct list_head head, *n, *next;
spin_lock_irq(&lweventlist_lock);
- list_splice_init(&lweventlist, &head);
+ list_replace_init(&lweventlist, &head);
spin_unlock_irq(&lweventlist_lock);
list_for_each_safe(n, next, &head) {