drm/i915: Fix frontbuffer false positve.
This return 0 without setting atomic bits on fb == crtc->cursor->fb
where causing frontbuffer false positives.
According to Daniel:
The original regression seems to have been introduced in the original
check/commit split:
commit 757f9a3e5b8a812af0c213099a5b31cb423f4d3c
Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:24 2014 -0300
drm/i915: move check of intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() out
Which already cause other trouble, resulting in the check getting moved in
commit e391ea882b1a04fb3f559287ac694652a3cd9da9
Author: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed Sep 24 14:20:25 2014 -0300
drm/i915: Fix not checking cursor and object sizes
The frontbuffer tracking itself only was broken when we shifted it into
the check/commit logic with:
commit 32b7eeec4d1e861230b09d437e95d76c86ff4a68
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Wed Dec 24 07:59:06 2014 -0800
drm/i915: Refactor work that can sleep out of commit (v7)
v2: When putting more debug prints I notice the solution was simpler
than I thought. AMS design is solid, just this return was wrong.
Sorry for the noise.
v3: Remove the entire chunck that would probably
be removed by gcc anyway. (by Daniel)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
1 file changed