cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()
The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332
("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 78a262f..d84aff1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2378,7 +2378,7 @@
* submitted by the CPU Frequency driver.
*
* Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code
- * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first
+ * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first
* (and isn't unregistered in the meantime).
*
*/