CacheFiles: Mark parent directory locks as I_MUTEX_PARENT to keep lockdep happy
Mark parent directory locks as I_MUTEX_PARENT in the callers of
cachefiles_bury_object() so that lockdep doesn't complain when that invokes
vfs_unlink():
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #47
---------------------------------------------
kslowd002/3089 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810bbf72>] vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00e4e61>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x1b0/0x831 [cachefiles]
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by kslowd002/3089:
#0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00e4e61>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x1b0/0x831 [cachefiles]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 3089, comm: kslowd002 Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #47
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8105ad7b>] __lock_acquire+0x1649/0x16e3
[<ffffffff8118170e>] ? inode_has_perm+0x5f/0x61
[<ffffffff8105ae6c>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
[<ffffffff810bbf72>] ? vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
[<ffffffff81353ac3>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x292
[<ffffffff810bbf72>] ? vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
[<ffffffff8118179e>] ? selinux_inode_permission+0x8e/0x90
[<ffffffff8117e271>] ? security_inode_permission+0x1c/0x1e
[<ffffffff810bb4fb>] ? inode_permission+0x99/0xa5
[<ffffffff810bbf72>] vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
[<ffffffff810adb19>] ? kfree+0xed/0xf9
[<ffffffffa00e3f00>] cachefiles_bury_object+0xb6/0x420 [cachefiles]
[<ffffffff81058e21>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffffa00e7e24>] ? cachefiles_check_object_xattr+0x233/0x293 [cachefiles]
[<ffffffffa00e51b0>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x4ff/0x831 [cachefiles]
[<ffffffff81032238>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xb2
[<ffffffffa00e3429>] cachefiles_lookup_object+0xac/0x12a [cachefiles]
[<ffffffffa00741e9>] fscache_lookup_object+0x1c7/0x214 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa0074fc5>] fscache_object_state_machine+0xa5/0x52d [fscache]
[<ffffffffa00754ac>] fscache_object_slow_work_execute+0x5f/0xa0 [fscache]
[<ffffffff81082093>] slow_work_execute+0x18f/0x2d1
[<ffffffff8108239a>] slow_work_thread+0x1c5/0x308
[<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
[<ffffffff810821d5>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x308
[<ffffffff8104be91>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
[<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8104be17>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
[<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: Daivd Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index 4ce818a..3df8695 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@
dir = dget_parent(object->dentry);
- mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
ret = cachefiles_bury_object(cache, dir, object->dentry);
dput(dir);
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
/* search the current directory for the element name */
_debug("lookup '%s'", name);
- mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
start = jiffies;
next = lookup_one_len(name, dir, nlen);