KVM: Do not re-execute INTn instruction.
Re-inject event instead. This is what Intel suggest. Also use correct
instruction length when re-injecting soft fault/interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 977a785..1d6c3f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -319,6 +319,8 @@
struct kvm_pio_request pio;
void *pio_data;
+ u8 event_exit_inst_len;
+
struct kvm_queued_exception {
bool pending;
bool has_error_code;
@@ -328,6 +330,7 @@
struct kvm_queued_interrupt {
bool pending;
+ bool soft;
u8 nr;
} interrupt;
@@ -510,7 +513,7 @@
u32 (*get_interrupt_shadow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int mask);
void (*patch_hypercall)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned char *hypercall_addr);
- void (*set_irq)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec);
+ void (*set_irq)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*set_nmi)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*queue_exception)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
bool has_error_code, u32 error_code);