Staging: lustre: Replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__
This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning in lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c-
WARNING: __func__ should be used instead of gcc specific __FUNCTION__
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index c3b6ad5..dcc2784 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@
LDLM_LOCK_GET(lock);
spin_unlock(&ns->ns_lock);
- lu_ref_add(&lock->l_reference, __FUNCTION__, current);
+ lu_ref_add(&lock->l_reference, __func__, current);
/* Pass the lock through the policy filter and see if it
* should stay in LRU.
@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@
result = pf(ns, lock, unused, added, count);
if (result == LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK) {
lu_ref_del(&lock->l_reference,
- __FUNCTION__, current);
+ __func__, current);
LDLM_LOCK_RELEASE(lock);
spin_lock(&ns->ns_lock);
break;
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@
* by itself, or the lock is no longer unused. */
unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
lu_ref_del(&lock->l_reference,
- __FUNCTION__, current);
+ __func__, current);
LDLM_LOCK_RELEASE(lock);
spin_lock(&ns->ns_lock);
continue;
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@
LASSERT(list_empty(&lock->l_bl_ast));
list_add(&lock->l_bl_ast, cancels);
unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
- lu_ref_del(&lock->l_reference, __FUNCTION__, current);
+ lu_ref_del(&lock->l_reference, __func__, current);
spin_lock(&ns->ns_lock);
added++;
unused--;