Documentation: fix cgroup typos and formatting
Fix format and spelling.
Signed-off-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
index ffec241..06eb6d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Memory Resource Controller
-NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred
- to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory
- controller used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
+NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has generically been referred to as the
+ memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller
+ used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
(For editors)
In this document:
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).
-Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used..
+Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used.
When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to
be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the
caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem.
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
OS point of view.
* What happens when a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
-When a cgroup his memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out
+When a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out
in this cgroup. Then, swap-out will not be done by cgroup routine and file
caches are dropped. But as mentioned above, global LRU can do swapout memory
from it for sanity of the system's memory management state. You can't forbid
@@ -491,13 +491,13 @@
cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem
hierarchy
- root
+ root
/ | \
- / | \
- a b c
- | \
- | \
- d e
+ / | \
+ a b c
+ | \
+ | \
+ d e
In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory
usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root),