i2c: xiic: Replace spinlock with mutex
All protected sections are only called from sleep-able context, so there is
no need to use a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
index 0b20449..6efd200 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
wait_queue_head_t wait;
struct i2c_adapter adap;
struct i2c_msg *tx_msg;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ struct mutex lock;
unsigned int tx_pos;
unsigned int nmsgs;
enum xilinx_i2c_state state;
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
* To find which interrupts are pending; AND interrupts pending with
* interrupts masked.
*/
- spin_lock(&i2c->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&i2c->lock);
isr = xiic_getreg32(i2c, XIIC_IISR_OFFSET);
ier = xiic_getreg32(i2c, XIIC_IIER_OFFSET);
pend = isr & ier;
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
dev_dbg(i2c->adap.dev.parent, "%s clr: 0x%x\n", __func__, clr);
xiic_setreg32(i2c, XIIC_IISR_OFFSET, clr);
- spin_unlock(&i2c->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&i2c->lock);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -662,10 +662,10 @@
static void xiic_start_xfer(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
{
- spin_lock(&i2c->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&i2c->lock);
xiic_reinit(i2c);
__xiic_start_xfer(i2c);
- spin_unlock(&i2c->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&i2c->lock);
}
static int xiic_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
i2c->adap.dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock);
+ mutex_init(&i2c->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&i2c->wait);
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, xiic_isr,