tcp/dccp: fix possible race __inet_lookup_established()
commit 8dbd76e79a16b45b2ccb01d2f2e08dbf64e71e40 upstream.
Michal Kubecek and Firo Yang did a very nice analysis of crashes
happening in __inet_lookup_established().
Since a TCP socket can go from TCP_ESTABLISH to TCP_LISTEN
(via a close()/socket()/listen() cycle) without a RCU grace period,
I should not have changed listeners linkage in their hash table.
They must use the nulls protocol (Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt),
so that a lookup can detect a socket in a hash list was moved in
another one.
Since we added code in commit d296ba60d8e2 ("soreuseport: Resolve
merge conflict for v4/v6 ordering fix"), we have to add
hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu() helper.
Fixes: 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not touch listener sk_refcnt under synflood")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191120083919.GH27852@unicorn.suse.cz/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
[stable-4.9: we also need to update code in __inet_lookup_listener() and
inet6_lookup_listener() which has been removed in 5.0-rc1.]
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index cced424..e1cf810 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1917,13 +1917,14 @@
struct tcp_iter_state *st = seq->private;
struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb;
+ struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
struct sock *sk = cur;
if (!sk) {
get_head:
ilb = &tcp_hashinfo.listening_hash[st->bucket];
spin_lock_bh(&ilb->lock);
- sk = sk_head(&ilb->head);
+ sk = sk_nulls_head(&ilb->nulls_head);
st->offset = 0;
goto get_sk;
}
@@ -1931,9 +1932,9 @@
++st->num;
++st->offset;
- sk = sk_next(sk);
+ sk = sk_nulls_next(sk);
get_sk:
- sk_for_each_from(sk) {
+ sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
if (!net_eq(sock_net(sk), net))
continue;
if (sk->sk_family == st->family)