SELinux: conditional.c whitespace, syntax, and static declaraction cleanups
This patch changes conditional.c to fix whitespace and syntax issues. Things that
are fixed may include (does not not have to include)
whitespace at end of lines
spaces followed by tabs
spaces used instead of tabs
spacing around parenthesis
locateion of { around struct and else clauses
location of * in pointer declarations
removal of initialization of static data to keep it in the right section
useless {} in if statemetns
useless checking for NULL before kfree
fixing of the indentation depth of switch statements
and any number of other things I forgot to mention
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
index a996cf1..5691af4 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
/* Authors: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@tresys.com>
- * Frank Mayer <mayerf@tresys.com>
+ * Frank Mayer <mayerf@tresys.com>
*
* Copyright (C) 2003 - 2004 Tresys Technology, LLC
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, version 2.
*/
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
{
int new_state;
- struct cond_av_list* cur;
+ struct cond_av_list *cur;
new_state = cond_evaluate_expr(p, node->expr);
if (new_state != node->cur_state) {
@@ -99,20 +99,18 @@
printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
/* turn the rules on or off */
for (cur = node->true_list; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
- if (new_state <= 0) {
+ if (new_state <= 0)
cur->node->key.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
- } else {
+ else
cur->node->key.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
- }
}
for (cur = node->false_list; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
/* -1 or 1 */
- if (new_state) {
+ if (new_state)
cur->node->key.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
- } else {
+ else
cur->node->key.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
- }
}
}
return 0;
@@ -174,8 +172,8 @@
int cond_init_bool_indexes(struct policydb *p)
{
kfree(p->bool_val_to_struct);
- p->bool_val_to_struct = (struct cond_bool_datum**)
- kmalloc(p->p_bools.nprim * sizeof(struct cond_bool_datum*), GFP_KERNEL);
+ p->bool_val_to_struct = (struct cond_bool_datum **)
+ kmalloc(p->p_bools.nprim * sizeof(struct cond_bool_datum *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p->bool_val_to_struct)
return -1;
return 0;
@@ -200,7 +198,7 @@
return -EINVAL;
p->p_bool_val_to_name[booldatum->value - 1] = key;
- p->bool_val_to_struct[booldatum->value -1] = booldatum;
+ p->bool_val_to_struct[booldatum->value - 1] = booldatum;
return 0;
}
@@ -252,8 +250,7 @@
return -1;
}
-struct cond_insertf_data
-{
+struct cond_insertf_data {
struct policydb *p;
struct cond_av_list *other;
struct cond_av_list *head;
@@ -353,9 +350,8 @@
return -1;
len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
- if (len == 0) {
+ if (len == 0)
return 0;
- }
data.p = p;
data.other = other;
@@ -408,15 +404,14 @@
/* expr */
len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++ ) {
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32) * 2);
if (rc < 0)
goto err;
expr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cond_expr), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!expr) {
+ if (!expr)
goto err;
- }
expr->expr_type = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
expr->bool = le32_to_cpu(buf[1]);
@@ -426,11 +421,10 @@
goto err;
}
- if (i == 0) {
+ if (i == 0)
node->expr = expr;
- } else {
+ else
last->next = expr;
- }
last = expr;
}
@@ -469,11 +463,10 @@
if (cond_read_node(p, node, fp) != 0)
goto err;
- if (i == 0) {
+ if (i == 0)
p->cond_list = node;
- } else {
+ else
last->next = node;
- }
last = node;
}
return 0;
@@ -490,24 +483,24 @@
{
struct avtab_node *node;
- if(!ctab || !key || !avd)
+ if (!ctab || !key || !avd)
return;
- for(node = avtab_search_node(ctab, key); node != NULL;
+ for (node = avtab_search_node(ctab, key); node != NULL;
node = avtab_search_node_next(node, key->specified)) {
- if ( (u16) (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
- (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+ if ((u16)(AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+ (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
avd->allowed |= node->datum.data;
- if ( (u16) (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
- (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+ if ((u16)(AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+ (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
/* Since a '0' in an auditdeny mask represents a
* permission we do NOT want to audit (dontaudit), we use
* the '&' operand to ensure that all '0's in the mask
* are retained (much unlike the allow and auditallow cases).
*/
avd->auditdeny &= node->datum.data;
- if ( (u16) (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
- (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+ if ((u16)(AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+ (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
avd->auditallow |= node->datum.data;
}
return;