dccp ccid-2: Separate option parsing from CCID processing
This patch replaces an almost identical replication of code: large parts
of dccp_parse_options() re-appeared as ccid2_ackvector() in ccid2.c.
Apart from the duplication, this caused two more problems:
1. CCIDs should not need to be concerned with parsing header options;
2. one can not assume that Ack Vectors appear as a contiguous area within an
skb, it is legal to insert other options and/or padding in between. The
current code would throw an error and stop reading in such a case.
Since Ack Vectors provide CCID-specific information, they are now processed
by the CCID directly, separating this functionality from the main DCCP code.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
diff --git a/net/dccp/options.c b/net/dccp/options.c
index dabd6ee..f06ffcf 100644
--- a/net/dccp/options.c
+++ b/net/dccp/options.c
@@ -128,13 +128,6 @@
if (rc)
goto out_featneg_failed;
break;
- case DCCPO_ACK_VECTOR_0:
- case DCCPO_ACK_VECTOR_1:
- if (dccp_packet_without_ack(skb)) /* RFC 4340, 11.4 */
- break;
- dccp_pr_debug("%s Ack Vector (len=%u)\n", dccp_role(sk),
- len);
- break;
case DCCPO_TIMESTAMP:
if (len != 4)
goto out_invalid_option;
@@ -224,6 +217,16 @@
pkt_type, opt, value, len))
goto out_invalid_option;
break;
+ case DCCPO_ACK_VECTOR_0:
+ case DCCPO_ACK_VECTOR_1:
+ if (dccp_packet_without_ack(skb)) /* RFC 4340, 11.4 */
+ break;
+ /*
+ * Ack vectors are processed by the TX CCID if it is
+ * interested. The RX CCID need not parse Ack Vectors,
+ * since it is only interested in clearing old state.
+ * Fall through.
+ */
case DCCPO_MIN_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC ... DCCPO_MAX_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC:
if (ccid_hc_tx_parse_options(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk,
pkt_type, opt, value, len))