hwmon: Simplify the locking model of two drivers
Many hardware monitoring drivers use two different mutexes, one to
protect their per-device data structure, and one to protect the
access to the device registers. These mutexes are essentially
redundant, as the drivers are transfering values between the device
registers and the data cache, so they almost always end up holding
both mutexes at the same time. Using a single mutex will make the
code more simple and faster.
I am changing only two of the affected drivers here, the authors
of the other affected drivers are welcome to submit similar patches
if they want.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/f71805f.c b/drivers/hwmon/f71805f.c
index a272cae..2fc5378 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/f71805f.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/f71805f.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@
struct f71805f_data {
unsigned short addr;
const char *name;
- struct mutex lock;
struct class_device *class_dev;
struct mutex update_lock;
@@ -271,50 +270,42 @@
* Device I/O access
*/
+/* Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization */
static u8 f71805f_read8(struct f71805f_data *data, u8 reg)
{
- u8 val;
-
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
- val = inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
-
- return val;
+ return inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
}
+/* Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization */
static void f71805f_write8(struct f71805f_data *data, u8 reg, u8 val)
{
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
outb(val, data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
}
/* It is important to read the MSB first, because doing so latches the
- value of the LSB, so we are sure both bytes belong to the same value. */
+ value of the LSB, so we are sure both bytes belong to the same value.
+ Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization */
static u16 f71805f_read16(struct f71805f_data *data, u8 reg)
{
u16 val;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
val = inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET) << 8;
outb(++reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
val |= inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
return val;
}
+/* Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization */
static void f71805f_write16(struct f71805f_data *data, u8 reg, u16 val)
{
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
outb(val >> 8, data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
outb(++reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
outb(val & 0xff, data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
}
static struct f71805f_data *f71805f_update_device(struct device *dev)
@@ -1150,7 +1141,6 @@
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 0);
data->addr = res->start;
- mutex_init(&data->lock);
data->name = names[sio_data->kind];
mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/it87.c b/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
index bb16668..18bb44d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/it87.c
@@ -221,7 +221,6 @@
struct it87_data {
struct i2c_client client;
struct class_device *class_dev;
- struct mutex lock;
enum chips type;
struct mutex update_lock;
@@ -548,9 +547,10 @@
struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
struct it87_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
int val = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
- u8 reg = it87_read_value(client, IT87_REG_FAN_DIV);
+ u8 reg;
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
+ reg = it87_read_value(client, IT87_REG_FAN_DIV);
switch (nr) {
case 0: data->fan_div[nr] = reg & 0x07; break;
case 1: data->fan_div[nr] = (reg >> 3) & 0x07; break;
@@ -949,7 +949,6 @@
}
new_client = &data->client;
- mutex_init(&data->lock);
i2c_set_clientdata(new_client, data);
new_client->addr = isa_address;
new_client->adapter = adapter;
@@ -1127,33 +1126,22 @@
return 0;
}
-/* ISA access must be locked explicitly!
+/* Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization.
We ignore the IT87 BUSY flag at this moment - it could lead to deadlocks,
would slow down the IT87 access and should not be necessary. */
static int it87_read_value(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg)
{
- struct it87_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
- int res;
-
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb_p(reg, client->addr + IT87_ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
- res = inb_p(client->addr + IT87_DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
-
- return res;
+ return inb_p(client->addr + IT87_DATA_REG_OFFSET);
}
-/* ISA access must be locked explicitly!
+/* Must be called with data->update_lock held, except during initialization.
We ignore the IT87 BUSY flag at this moment - it could lead to deadlocks,
would slow down the IT87 access and should not be necessary. */
static void it87_write_value(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 value)
{
- struct it87_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
-
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
outb_p(reg, client->addr + IT87_ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
outb_p(value, client->addr + IT87_DATA_REG_OFFSET);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
}
/* Return 1 if and only if the PWM interface is safe to use */