cifs: clean up accesses to midCount
It's an atomic_t and the code accesses the "counter" field in it directly
instead of using atomic_read(). It also is sometimes accessed under a
spinlock and sometimes not. Move it out of the spinlock since we don't need
belt-and-suspenders for something that's just informational.
Reviewed-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
index 9a14f77..b9eb0cf 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@
temp->tsk = current;
}
- spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
- list_add_tail(&temp->qhead, &server->pending_mid_q);
atomic_inc(&midCount);
temp->midState = MID_REQUEST_ALLOCATED;
+ spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
+ list_add_tail(&temp->qhead, &server->pending_mid_q);
spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
return temp;
}
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@
spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
midEntry->midState = MID_FREE;
list_del(&midEntry->qhead);
- atomic_dec(&midCount);
spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
+ atomic_dec(&midCount);
if (midEntry->largeBuf)
cifs_buf_release(midEntry->resp_buf);
else