xfs: remote attribute overwrite causes transaction overrun
Commit e461fcb ("xfs: remote attribute lookups require the value
length") passes the remote attribute length in the xfs_da_args
structure on lookup so that CRC calculations and validity checking
can be performed correctly by related code. This, unfortunately has
the side effect of changing the args->valuelen parameter in cases
where it shouldn't.
That is, when we replace a remote attribute, the incoming
replacement stores the value and length in args->value and
args->valuelen, but then the lookup which finds the existing remote
attribute overwrites args->valuelen with the length of the remote
attribute being replaced. Hence when we go to create the new
attribute, we create it of the size of the existing remote
attribute, not the size it is supposed to be. When the new attribute
is much smaller than the old attribute, this results in a
transaction overrun and an ASSERT() failure on a debug kernel:
XFS: Assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, line: 331
Fix this by keeping the remote attribute value length separate to
the attribute value length in the xfs_da_args structure. The enables
us to pass the length of the remote attribute to be removed without
overwriting the new attribute's length.
Also, ensure that when we save remote block contexts for a later
rename we zero the original state variables so that we don't confuse
the state of the attribute to be removes with the state of the new
attribute that we just added. [Spotted by Brain Foster.]
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c
index 01b6a01..abda112 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
* Out of line attribute, cannot double split, but
* make room for the attribute value itself.
*/
- uint dblocks = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, valuelen);
+ uint dblocks = xfs_attr3_rmt_blocks(mp, valuelen);
nblks += dblocks;
nblks += XFS_NEXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, dblocks, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
}
@@ -698,11 +698,22 @@
trace_xfs_attr_leaf_replace(args);
+ /* save the attribute state for later removal*/
args->op_flags |= XFS_DA_OP_RENAME; /* an atomic rename */
args->blkno2 = args->blkno; /* set 2nd entry info*/
args->index2 = args->index;
args->rmtblkno2 = args->rmtblkno;
args->rmtblkcnt2 = args->rmtblkcnt;
+ args->rmtvaluelen2 = args->rmtvaluelen;
+
+ /*
+ * clear the remote attr state now that it is saved so that the
+ * values reflect the state of the attribute we are about to
+ * add, not the attribute we just found and will remove later.
+ */
+ args->rmtblkno = 0;
+ args->rmtblkcnt = 0;
+ args->rmtvaluelen = 0;
}
/*
@@ -794,6 +805,7 @@
args->blkno = args->blkno2;
args->rmtblkno = args->rmtblkno2;
args->rmtblkcnt = args->rmtblkcnt2;
+ args->rmtvaluelen = args->rmtvaluelen2;
if (args->rmtblkno) {
error = xfs_attr_rmtval_remove(args);
if (error)
@@ -999,13 +1011,22 @@
trace_xfs_attr_node_replace(args);
+ /* save the attribute state for later removal*/
args->op_flags |= XFS_DA_OP_RENAME; /* atomic rename op */
args->blkno2 = args->blkno; /* set 2nd entry info*/
args->index2 = args->index;
args->rmtblkno2 = args->rmtblkno;
args->rmtblkcnt2 = args->rmtblkcnt;
+ args->rmtvaluelen2 = args->rmtvaluelen;
+
+ /*
+ * clear the remote attr state now that it is saved so that the
+ * values reflect the state of the attribute we are about to
+ * add, not the attribute we just found and will remove later.
+ */
args->rmtblkno = 0;
args->rmtblkcnt = 0;
+ args->rmtvaluelen = 0;
}
retval = xfs_attr3_leaf_add(blk->bp, state->args);
@@ -1133,6 +1154,7 @@
args->blkno = args->blkno2;
args->rmtblkno = args->rmtblkno2;
args->rmtblkcnt = args->rmtblkcnt2;
+ args->rmtvaluelen = args->rmtvaluelen2;
if (args->rmtblkno) {
error = xfs_attr_rmtval_remove(args);
if (error)