wireless: remove superfluous if statement in regulatory code
Commit eeca9fce1d71 ('cfg80211: Schedule timeout for all CRDA calls')
left behind a superfluous check after it removed some earlier code.
In reg_process_hint, the test of "treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE ||
treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET" is superfluous because the code in the
if-then branch is identical to the code after the if statement.
Coverity CID #1295939
I also removed the unnecessary assignment of treatment in this case,
and added a comment reminding any future patch authors to ensure that
treatment is properly assigned before it is used after the switch.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
index d359e06..62d8ea4 100644
--- a/net/wireless/reg.c
+++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
@@ -2079,10 +2079,7 @@
reg_process_hint_core(reg_request);
return;
case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_USER:
- treatment = reg_process_hint_user(reg_request);
- if (treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE ||
- treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET)
- return;
+ reg_process_hint_user(reg_request);
return;
case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER:
if (!wiphy)
@@ -2099,7 +2096,9 @@
goto out_free;
}
- /* This is required so that the orig_* parameters are saved */
+ /* This is required so that the orig_* parameters are saved.
+ * NOTE: treatment must be set for any case that reaches here!
+ */
if (treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET && wiphy &&
wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_STRICT_REG) {
wiphy_update_regulatory(wiphy, reg_request->initiator);