dma: of: Remove check on always true condition
Both of_dma_nbcells field of the of_dma_controller and the args_count field of
the dma_spec are initialized by parsing the #dma-cells attribute of their device
tree node. So if the device tree nodes of a DMA controller and the dma_spec
match this means that of_dma_nbcells and args_count will also match. So the
second test in the of_dma_find_controller loop is redundant because given the
first test yields true the second test will also yield true. So we can safely
remove the test whether of_dma_nbcells matches args_count. Since this was the
last user of the of_dma_nbcells field we can remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
index 268cc8a..75334bd 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
@@ -35,8 +35,7 @@
struct of_dma *ofdma;
list_for_each_entry(ofdma, &of_dma_list, of_dma_controllers)
- if ((ofdma->of_node == dma_spec->np) &&
- (ofdma->of_dma_nbcells == dma_spec->args_count))
+ if (ofdma->of_node == dma_spec->np)
return ofdma;
pr_debug("%s: can't find DMA controller %s\n", __func__,
@@ -64,7 +63,6 @@
void *data)
{
struct of_dma *ofdma;
- const __be32 *prop;
if (!np || !of_dma_xlate) {
pr_err("%s: not enough information provided\n", __func__);
@@ -75,17 +73,7 @@
if (!ofdma)
return -ENOMEM;
- prop = of_get_property(np, "#dma-cells", NULL);
- if (!prop) {
- pr_err("%s: #dma-cells property is missing\n",
- __func__);
- kfree(ofdma);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
-
ofdma->of_node = np;
- ofdma->of_dma_nbcells = be32_to_cpup(prop);
ofdma->of_dma_xlate = of_dma_xlate;
ofdma->of_dma_data = data;