Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix a Host signaling bug
Currently we have two policies for deciding when to signal the host:
One based on the ring buffer state and the other based on what the
VMBUS client driver wants to do. Consider the case when the client
wants to explicitly control when to signal the host. In this case,
if the client were to defer signaling, we will not be able to signal
the host subsequently when the client does want to signal since the
ring buffer state will prevent the signaling. Implement logic to
have only one signaling policy in force for a given channel.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel.c b/drivers/hv/channel.c
index 77d2579..2889d97 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/channel.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/channel.c
@@ -653,10 +653,19 @@
* on the ring. We will not signal if more data is
* to be placed.
*
+ * Based on the channel signal state, we will decide
+ * which signaling policy will be applied.
+ *
* If we cannot write to the ring-buffer; signal the host
* even if we may not have written anything. This is a rare
* enough condition that it should not matter.
*/
+
+ if (channel->signal_policy)
+ signal = true;
+ else
+ kick_q = true;
+
if (((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal) || (ret))
vmbus_setevent(channel);
@@ -756,10 +765,19 @@
* on the ring. We will not signal if more data is
* to be placed.
*
+ * Based on the channel signal state, we will decide
+ * which signaling policy will be applied.
+ *
* If we cannot write to the ring-buffer; signal the host
* even if we may not have written anything. This is a rare
* enough condition that it should not matter.
*/
+
+ if (channel->signal_policy)
+ signal = true;
+ else
+ kick_q = true;
+
if (((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal) || (ret))
vmbus_setevent(channel);