Documentation: robust-futexes: fix spelling mistakes
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
diff --git a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
index af6fce2..61c22d6 100644
--- a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@
- no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone.
- - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont
+ - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes don't
need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very
- lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer
+ lightweight primitive - so they don't force the application designer
to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust
mutexes are just as fast.
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
Testing, architecture support
-----------------------------
-i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
+I've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the
parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is
deliberately corrupted.