tree 1c2d3ae77e725695d5b9051feb003271cf64c9ea
parent 149be47d9ccc453bba84b814980bf9c7693b6a90
author Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> 1545986207 -0800
committer Srinivas Paladugu <srnvs@google.com> 1549013175 +0000

BACKPORT: zram: support idle/huge page writeback

Add a new feature "zram idle/huge page writeback".  In the zram-swap use
case, zram usually has many idle/huge swap pages.  It's pointless to keep
them in memory (ie, zram).

To solve this problem, this feature introduces idle/huge page writeback to
the backing device so the goal is to save more memory space on embedded
systems.

Normal sequence to use idle/huge page writeback feature is as follows,

while (1) {
        # mark allocated zram slot to idle
        echo all > /sys/block/zram0/idle
        # leave system working for several hours
        # Unless there is no access for some blocks on zram,
	# they are still IDLE marked pages.

        echo "idle" > /sys/block/zram0/writeback
	or/and
	echo "huge" > /sys/block/zram0/writeback
        # write the IDLE or/and huge marked slot into backing device
	# and free the memory.
}

Per the discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181122065926.GG3441@jagdpanzerIV/T/#u,

This patch removes direct incommpressibe page writeback feature
(d2afd25114f4 ("zram: write incompressible pages to backing device")).

Below concerns from Sergey:
== &< ==

"IDLE writeback" is superior to "incompressible writeback".

"incompressible writeback" is completely unpredictable and uncontrollable;
it depens on data patterns and compression algorithms.  While "IDLE
writeback" is predictable.

I even suspect, that, *ideally*, we can remove "incompressible writeback".
"IDLE pages" is a super set which also includes "incompressible" pages.
So, technically, we still can do "incompressible writeback" from "IDLE
writeback" path; but a much more reasonable one, based on a page idling
period.

I understand that you want to keep "direct incompressible writeback"
around.  ZRAM is especially popular on devices which do suffer from flash
wearout, so I can see "incompressible writeback" path becoming a dead
code, long term.

== &< ==

Below concerns from Minchan:
== &< ==

My concern is if we enable CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK in this implementation,
both hugepage/idlepage writeck will turn on.  However someuser want to
enable only idlepage writeback so we need to introduce turn on/off knob
for hugepage or new CONFIG_ZRAM_IDLEPAGE_WRITEBACK for those usecase.  I
don't want to make it complicated *if possible*.

Long term, I imagine we need to make VM aware of new swap hierarchy a
little bit different with as-is.  For example, first high priority swap
can return -EIO or -ENOCOMP, swap try to fallback to next lower priority
swap device.  With that, hugepage writeback will work tranparently.

So we could regard it as regression because incompressible pages doesn't
go to backing storage automatically.  Instead, user should do it via "echo
huge" > /sys/block/zram/writeback" manually.

== &< ==

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127055429.251614-6-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit a939888ec38bf1f33e4a903056677e92a4844244)
Conflicts:
        drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
Fix usage of bio_init()

Bug: 117683045
Change-Id: I82afe541fdb60b24cde74f42de4d6b3dd6d8266c
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Paladugu <srnvs@google.com>