Btrfs: fix how we deal with the orphan block rsv
Ceph was hitting this race where we would remove an inode from the per-root
orphan list before we would release the space we had reserved for the inode.
We actually don't need a list or anything, we just need to make sure the
root doesn't try to free up the orphan reserve until after the inodes have
released their reservations. So use an atomic counter instead of a list on
the root and only decrement the counter after we've released our
reservation. I've tested this as well as several others and we no longer
see the warnings that you would see while running ceph. Thanks,
Btrfs: fix how we deal with the orphan block rsv
Ceph was hitting this race where we would remove an inode from the per-root
orphan list before we would release the space we had reserved for the inode.
We actually don't need a list or anything, we just need to make sure the
root doesn't try to free up the orphan reserve until after the inodes have
released their reservations. So use an atomic counter instead of a list on
the root and only decrement the counter after we've released our
reservation. I've tested this as well as several others and we no longer
see the warnings that you would see while running ceph. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 91ad639..0298928 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2104,12 +2104,12 @@
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
int ret;
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes) ||
root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE)
return;
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&root->orphan_list)) {
+ if (atomic_read(&root->orphan_inodes)) {
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
return;
}
@@ -2166,8 +2166,8 @@
block_rsv = NULL;
}
- if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags)) {
#if 0
/*
* For proper ENOSPC handling, we should do orphan
@@ -2180,6 +2180,7 @@
insert = 1;
#endif
insert = 1;
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
@@ -2197,6 +2198,8 @@
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret && ret != -EEXIST) {
+ clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2227,10 +2230,9 @@
int ret = 0;
spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
delete_item = 1;
- }
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
@@ -2242,8 +2244,10 @@
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or corruption (JDM: Recheck) */
}
- if (release_rsv)
+ if (release_rsv) {
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -2371,6 +2375,8 @@
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto out;
}
+ printk(KERN_ERR "auto deleting %Lu\n",
+ found_key.objectid);
ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
found_key.objectid);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or corruption (JDM: Recheck) */
@@ -2382,9 +2388,8 @@
* add this inode to the orphan list so btrfs_orphan_del does
* the proper thing when we hit it
*/
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- list_add(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan, &root->orphan_list);
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
+ set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
/* if we have links, this was a truncate, lets do that */
if (inode->i_nlink) {
@@ -3706,7 +3711,8 @@
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan));
+ BUG_ON(!test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags));
goto no_delete;
}
@@ -6903,7 +6909,6 @@
mutex_init(&ei->log_mutex);
mutex_init(&ei->delalloc_mutex);
btrfs_ordered_inode_tree_init(&ei->ordered_tree);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_orphan);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->delalloc_inodes);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->ordered_operations);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&ei->rb_node);
@@ -6948,13 +6953,12 @@
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
}
- spin_lock(&root->orphan_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+ if (test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: inode %llu still on the orphan list\n",
(unsigned long long)btrfs_ino(inode));
- list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+ atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
}
- spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
while (1) {
ordered = btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(inode, (u64)-1);