perf, x86: Fix pebs drains

I overlooked the perf_disable()/perf_enable() calls in
intel_pmu_handle_irq(), (pointed out by Markus) so we should not
explicitly disable_all/enable_all pebs counters in the drain functions,
these are already disabled and enabling them early is confusing.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index a7401e4..66c6962 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -476,18 +476,16 @@
 	if (!event || !ds || !x86_pmu.pebs)
 		return;
 
-	intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all();
-
 	at  = (struct pebs_record_core *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 	top = (struct pebs_record_core *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
 
 	if (top <= at)
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 
 	if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
 	data.period = event->hw.last_period;
@@ -528,9 +526,6 @@
 
 	if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, &regs))
 		x86_pmu_stop(event);
-
-out:
-	intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all();
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
@@ -547,13 +542,11 @@
 	if (!ds || !x86_pmu.pebs)
 		return;
 
-	intel_pmu_pebs_disable_all();
-
 	at  = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 	top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
 
 	if (top <= at)
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
 
@@ -604,8 +597,6 @@
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, &regs))
 			x86_pmu_stop(event);
 	}
-out:
-	intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all();
 }
 
 /*