selinux: cleanup selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() and selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match()
Do some basic simplification and comment reformatting.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index f8d7126..4a7ba4a 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -155,42 +155,30 @@
int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
{
int rc;
- u32 sel_sid;
- /* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
- if (ctx) {
- if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- sel_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
- } else
- /*
- * All flows should be treated as polmatch'ing an
- * otherwise applicable "non-labeled" policy. This
- * would prevent inadvertent "leaks".
- */
+ /* All flows should be treated as polmatch'ing an otherwise applicable
+ * "non-labeled" policy. This would prevent inadvertent "leaks". */
+ if (!ctx)
return 0;
- rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, sel_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
- ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH,
- NULL);
+ /* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
+ if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
+ return -EINVAL;
- if (rc == -EACCES)
- return -ESRCH;
-
- return rc;
+ rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+ SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH, NULL);
+ return (rc == -EACCES ? -ESRCH : rc);
}
/*
* LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a state matches
* the given policy, flow combo.
*/
-
-int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
- const struct flowi *fl)
+int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
+ struct xfrm_policy *xp,
+ const struct flowi *fl)
{
u32 state_sid;
- int rc;
if (!xp->security)
if (x->security)
@@ -213,18 +201,12 @@
if (fl->flowi_secid != state_sid)
return 0;
- rc = avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
- ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
- NULL)? 0:1;
-
- /*
- * We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check
- * since the SA is now of the same label as the flow and
- * a flow Vs. policy polmatch check had already happened
- * in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above.
- */
-
- return rc;
+ /* We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check since the SA
+ * is now of the same label as the flow and a flow Vs. policy polmatch
+ * check had already happened in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above. */
+ return (avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid,
+ SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
+ NULL) ? 0 : 1);
}
/*