um: siginfo cleanup
Currently we use both struct siginfo and siginfo_t.
Let's use struct siginfo internally to avoid ongoing
compiler warning. We are allowed to do so because
struct siginfo and siginfo_t are equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
index 9d9f1b4..905924b 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
[SIGIO] = sigio_handler,
[SIGVTALRM] = timer_handler };
-static void sig_handler_common(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc)
+static void sig_handler_common(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
{
struct uml_pt_regs r;
int save_errno = errno;
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
static int signals_enabled;
static unsigned int signals_pending;
-void sig_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc)
+void sig_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
{
int enabled;
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
panic("enabling signal stack failed, errno = %d\n", errno);
}
-static void (*handlers[_NSIG])(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc) = {
+static void (*handlers[_NSIG])(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc) = {
[SIGSEGV] = sig_handler,
[SIGBUS] = sig_handler,
[SIGILL] = sig_handler,
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
while ((sig = ffs(pending)) != 0){
sig--;
pending &= ~(1 << sig);
- (*handlers[sig])(sig, si, mc);
+ (*handlers[sig])(sig, (struct siginfo *)si, mc);
}
/*