CAN: Use inode instead of kernel address for /proc file
Since the socket address is just being used as a unique identifier, its
inode number is an alternative that does not leak potentially sensitive
information.
CC-ing stable because MITRE has assigned CVE-2010-4565 to the issue.
Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 6faa825..9d5e8ac 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
struct list_head tx_ops;
unsigned long dropped_usr_msgs;
struct proc_dir_entry *bcm_proc_read;
- char procname [20]; /* pointer printed in ASCII with \0 */
+ char procname [32]; /* inode number in decimal with \0 */
};
static inline struct bcm_sock *bcm_sk(const struct sock *sk)
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@
if (proc_dir) {
/* unique socket address as filename */
- sprintf(bo->procname, "%p", sock);
+ sprintf(bo->procname, "%lu", sock_i_ino(sk));
bo->bcm_proc_read = proc_create_data(bo->procname, 0644,
proc_dir,
&bcm_proc_fops, sk);