[PATCH] rtc framewok: rtc_wkalrm.enabled reporting updates
Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: use
the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) of
"alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc code, which
originated that reporting API).
Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate status,
and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. We really don't
want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
index bd4d7d1..9c8ead4 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
@@ -289,9 +289,7 @@
static int sa1100_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
{
- seq_printf(seq, "trim/divider\t: 0x%08lx\n", RTTR);
- seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
- (RTSR & RTSR_ALE) ? "yes" : "no" );
+ seq_printf(seq, "trim/divider\t: 0x%08x\n", (u32) RTTR);
seq_printf(seq, "update_IRQ\t: %s\n",
(RTSR & RTSR_HZE) ? "yes" : "no");
seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n",