cifs: use type __u32 instead of int for the oplock parameter
... and avoid implicit casting from a signed type. Also, pass oplock by value
instead by reference as we don't intend to change the value in
cifs_open_inode_helper().
Thanks to Jeff Layton for spotting this.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index de748c6..d33da45 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
/* all arguments to this function must be checked for validity in caller */
static inline int cifs_open_inode_helper(struct inode *inode,
- struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon, int *oplock, FILE_ALL_INFO *buf,
+ struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon, __u32 oplock, FILE_ALL_INFO *buf,
char *full_path, int xid)
{
struct cifsInodeInfo *pCifsInode = CIFS_I(inode);
@@ -207,11 +207,11 @@
rc = cifs_get_inode_info(&inode, full_path, buf, inode->i_sb,
xid, NULL);
- if ((*oplock & 0xF) == OPLOCK_EXCLUSIVE) {
+ if ((oplock & 0xF) == OPLOCK_EXCLUSIVE) {
pCifsInode->clientCanCacheAll = true;
pCifsInode->clientCanCacheRead = true;
cFYI(1, "Exclusive Oplock granted on inode %p", inode);
- } else if ((*oplock & 0xF) == OPLOCK_READ)
+ } else if ((oplock & 0xF) == OPLOCK_READ)
pCifsInode->clientCanCacheRead = true;
return rc;
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
goto out;
}
- rc = cifs_open_inode_helper(inode, tcon, &oplock, buf, full_path, xid);
+ rc = cifs_open_inode_helper(inode, tcon, oplock, buf, full_path, xid);
if (rc != 0)
goto out;