mutex: add atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), fix
include/linux/mutex.h:136: warning: 'mutex_lock' declared inline after being called
include/linux/mutex.h:136: warning: previous declaration of 'mutex_lock' was here
uninline it.
[ Impact: clean up and uninline, address compiler warning ]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <200904292318.n3TNIsi6028340@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index 507cf2b..e2d25e9 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -471,5 +471,28 @@
return ret;
}
-
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
+
+/**
+ * atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock - return holding mutex if we dec to 0
+ * @cnt: the atomic which we are to dec
+ * @lock: the mutex to return holding if we dec to 0
+ *
+ * return true and hold lock if we dec to 0, return false otherwise
+ */
+int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ /* dec if we can't possibly hit 0 */
+ if (atomic_add_unless(cnt, -1, 1))
+ return 0;
+ /* we might hit 0, so take the lock */
+ mutex_lock(lock);
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(cnt)) {
+ /* when we actually did the dec, we didn't hit 0 */
+ mutex_unlock(lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* we hit 0, and we hold the lock */
+ return 1;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock);