[ARM] fix naming of MODULE_START / MODULE_END
As of 73bdf0a60e607f4b8ecc5aec597105976565a84f, the kernel needs
to know where modules are located in the virtual address space.
On ARM, we located this region between MODULE_START and MODULE_END.
Unfortunately, everyone else calls it MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END.
Update ARM to use the same naming, so is_vmalloc_or_module_addr()
can work properly. Also update the comment on mm/vmalloc.c to
reflect that ARM also places modules in a separate region from the
vmalloc space.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index f1cc03b..66fad3f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
static inline int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
{
/*
- * x86-64 and sparc64 put modules in a special place,
+ * ARM, x86-64 and sparc64 put modules in a special place,
* and fall back on vmalloc() if that fails. Others
* just put it in the vmalloc space.
*/