exec: kill unsafe BUG_ON(sig->count) checks
de_thread:
if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) <= 1)
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&sig->count) != 1);
This is not safe without the rmb() in between. The results of two
correctly ordered __exit_signal()->atomic_dec_and_test()'s could be seen
out of order on our CPU.
The same is true for the "thread_group_empty()" case, __unhash_process()'s
changes could be seen before atomic_dec_and_test(&sig->count).
On some platforms (including i386) atomic_read() doesn't provide even the
compiler barrier, in that case these checks are simply racy.
Remove these BUG_ON()'s. Alternatively, we can do something like
BUG_ON( ({ smp_rmb(); atomic_read(&sig->count) != 1; }) );
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index af4361c..c21a8cc 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -784,7 +784,6 @@
* and we can just re-use it all.
*/
if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) <= 1) {
- BUG_ON(atomic_read(&sig->count) != 1);
signalfd_detach(tsk);
exit_itimers(sig);
return 0;
@@ -929,8 +928,6 @@
if (leader)
release_task(leader);
- BUG_ON(atomic_read(&sig->count) != 1);
-
if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) == 1) {
/*
* Now that we nuked the rest of the thread group,