target: Allow AllRegistrants to re-RESERVE existing reservation
This patch changes core_scsi3_pro_release() logic to allow an
existing AllRegistrants type reservation to be re-reserved by
any registered I_T nexus.
This addresses a issue where AllRegistrants type RESERVE was
receiving RESERVATION_CONFLICT status if dev_pr_res_holder did
not match the same I_T nexus, instead of just returning GOOD
status following spc4r34 Section 5.9.9:
"If the device server receives a PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT command
with RESERVE service action where the TYPE field and the SCOPE
field contain the same values as the existing type and scope
from a persistent reservation holder, it shall not make any
change to the existing persistent reservation and shall complete
the command with GOOD status."
Reported-by: Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsimpis@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilias Tsitsimpis <i.tsitsimpis@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
index 703890c..f75a4ba 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,7 @@
spin_lock(&dev->dev_reservation_lock);
pr_res_holder = dev->dev_pr_res_holder;
if (pr_res_holder) {
+ int pr_res_type = pr_res_holder->pr_res_type;
/*
* From spc4r17 Section 5.7.9: Reserving:
*
@@ -2284,7 +2285,9 @@
* the logical unit, then the command shall be completed with
* RESERVATION CONFLICT status.
*/
- if (pr_res_holder != pr_reg) {
+ if ((pr_res_holder != pr_reg) &&
+ (pr_res_type != PR_TYPE_WRITE_EXCLUSIVE_ALLREG) &&
+ (pr_res_type != PR_TYPE_EXCLUSIVE_ACCESS_ALLREG)) {
struct se_node_acl *pr_res_nacl = pr_res_holder->pr_reg_nacl;
pr_err("SPC-3 PR: Attempted RESERVE from"
" [%s]: %s while reservation already held by"