libata: Fix a large collection of DMA mode mismatches
Dave Müller sent a diff for the pata_oldpiix that highlighted a problem
where a lot of the ATA drivers assume dma_mode == 0 means "no DMA" while
the core code uses 0xFF.
This turns out to have other consequences such as code doing >= XFER_UDMA_0
also catching 0xFF as UDMAlots. Fortunately it doesn't generally affect
set_dma_mode, although some drivers call back into their own set mode code
from other points.
Having been through the drivers I've added helpers for using_udma/using_mwdma
dma_enabled so that people don't open code ranges that may change (eg if UDMA8
appears somewhere)
Thanks to David for the initial bits
[and added fix for pata_oldpiix from and signed-off-by Dave Mueller
<dave.mueller@gmx.ch> -jg]
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c b/drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c
index fbe6057..eb919c1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
if (adev != acpi->last) {
pacpi_set_piomode(ap, adev);
- if (adev->dma_mode)
+ if (ata_dma_enabled(adev))
pacpi_set_dmamode(ap, adev);
acpi->last = adev;
}