x86, UV: Use allocated buffer in tlb_uv.c:tunables_read()
The original code didn't check that the value returned from
snprintf() was less than the size of the buffer. Although it
didn't cause a runtime bug in this case, it makes the static
checkers complain.
Andrew Morton suggested a dynamically sized buffer would be
cleaner.
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100929083118.GA6376@bicker>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
index 312ef02..33e77e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1001,10 +1001,10 @@
static ssize_t tunables_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
- char buf[300];
+ char *buf;
int ret;
- ret = snprintf(buf, 300, "%s %s %s\n%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
+ buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s %s\n%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
"max_bau_concurrent plugged_delay plugsb4reset",
"timeoutsb4reset ipi_reset_limit complete_threshold",
"congested_response_us congested_reps congested_period",
@@ -1012,7 +1012,12 @@
timeoutsb4reset, ipi_reset_limit, complete_threshold,
congested_response_us, congested_reps, congested_period);
- return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, ret);
+ if (!buf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, strlen(buf));
+ kfree(buf);
+ return ret;
}
/*