fs/block_dev.c: no need to check inode->i_bdev in bd_forget()
Its only caller evict() has promised a non-NULL inode->i_bdev.
Signed-off-by: Yan Hong <clouds.yan@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index aae187a..ce08de7 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -617,11 +617,9 @@
struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
- if (inode->i_bdev) {
- if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb))
- bdev = inode->i_bdev;
- __bd_forget(inode);
- }
+ if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb))
+ bdev = inode->i_bdev;
+ __bd_forget(inode);
spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
if (bdev)