AFS: Use patched rxrpc_kernel_send_data() correctly
Fix afs_send_simple_reply() to accept a greater-than-zero return value from
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() as being a successful return rather than thinking it
an error and aborting the call.
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() previously returned zero incorrectly when it worked
successfully, but has been patched to return the number of bytes it
transmitted.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 1b36f45..8ccee9e 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@
{
struct msghdr msg;
struct iovec iov[1];
+ int n;
_enter("");
@@ -806,22 +807,20 @@
msg.msg_flags = 0;
call->state = AFS_CALL_AWAIT_ACK;
- switch (rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len)) {
- case 0:
+ n = rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len);
+ if (n >= 0) {
_leave(" [replied]");
return;
-
- case -ENOMEM:
+ }
+ if (n == -ENOMEM) {
_debug("oom");
rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(call->rxcall, RX_USER_ABORT);
- default:
- rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall);
- call->rxcall = NULL;
- call->type->destructor(call);
- afs_free_call(call);
- _leave(" [error]");
- return;
}
+ rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall);
+ call->rxcall = NULL;
+ call->type->destructor(call);
+ afs_free_call(call);
+ _leave(" [error]");
}
/*