[libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info
The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually
writing in the hex mask.
Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
index 2c0bc3b..0231aba 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
@@ -495,14 +495,14 @@
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
- .udma_mask = 0x1f,
+ .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA4,
.port_ops = &serverworks_csb_port_ops
}, { /* CSB5 - later revisions*/
.sht = &serverworks_sht,
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
- .udma_mask = 0x3f,
+ .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA5,
.port_ops = &serverworks_csb_port_ops
}
};