bonding: don't call slave_xxx_netpoll under spinlocks
The slave_xxx_netpoll will call synchronize_rcu_bh(),
so the function may schedule and sleep, it should't be
called under spinlocks.
bond_netpoll_setup() and bond_netpoll_cleanup() are always
protected by rtnl lock, it is no need to take the read lock,
as the slave list couldn't be changed outside rtnl lock.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index ae9864c..5cd8e0a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1219,8 +1219,9 @@
{
}
-static void __bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct bonding *bond)
+static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct slave *slave;
int i;
@@ -1228,14 +1229,6 @@
if (IS_UP(slave->dev))
slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
}
-static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
-{
- struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
-
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
- __bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
-}
static int bond_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct netpoll_info *ni, gfp_t gfp)
{
@@ -1243,15 +1236,13 @@
struct slave *slave;
int i, err = 0;
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
err = slave_enable_netpoll(slave);
if (err) {
- __bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond);
+ bond_netpoll_cleanup(dev);
break;
}
}
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
return err;
}