mm/nommu.c: drop unlikely inside BUG_ON()
(1) For !CONFIG_BUG cases, the bug call is a no-op, so we couldn't
care less and the change is ok.
(2) ppc and mips, which HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON, do not rely on branch
predictions as it seems to be pointless[1] and thus callers should not
be trying to push an optimization in the first place.
(3) For CONFIG_BUG and !HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON cases, BUG_ON() contains an
unlikely compiler flag already.
Hence, we can drop unlikely behind BUG_ON().
[1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1101.3/02289.html
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
index 1e0f168..92be862 100644
--- a/mm/nommu.c
+++ b/mm/nommu.c
@@ -578,16 +578,16 @@
return;
last = rb_entry(lastp, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
- BUG_ON(unlikely(last->vm_end <= last->vm_start));
- BUG_ON(unlikely(last->vm_top < last->vm_end));
+ BUG_ON(last->vm_end <= last->vm_start);
+ BUG_ON(last->vm_top < last->vm_end);
while ((p = rb_next(lastp))) {
region = rb_entry(p, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
last = rb_entry(lastp, struct vm_region, vm_rb);
- BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_end <= region->vm_start));
- BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_top < region->vm_end));
- BUG_ON(unlikely(region->vm_start < last->vm_top));
+ BUG_ON(region->vm_end <= region->vm_start);
+ BUG_ON(region->vm_top < region->vm_end);
+ BUG_ON(region->vm_start < last->vm_top);
lastp = p;
}