[SCSI] libfc: RNN_ID may be required before RSNN_NN with some switches
One could interpret FC-GS-5 to say that an explicit RNN_ID is required
before RSNN_NN is allowed to succeed, which is why RNN_ID was not obsoleted
along with RPN_ID acording to this document:
ftp://ftp.t11.org/t11/member/fc/gs-5/05-546v2.pdf
Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
diff --git a/include/scsi/fc_encode.h b/include/scsi/fc_encode.h
index c93ca3e..ad13cb1 100644
--- a/include/scsi/fc_encode.h
+++ b/include/scsi/fc_encode.h
@@ -128,12 +128,12 @@
ct->payload.rft.fts = lport->fcts;
break;
- case FC_NS_RPN_ID:
+ case FC_NS_RNN_ID:
ct = fc_ct_hdr_fill(fp, op, sizeof(struct fc_ns_rn_id));
hton24(ct->payload.rn.fr_fid.fp_fid,
fc_host_port_id(lport->host));
ct->payload.rft.fts = lport->fcts;
- put_unaligned_be64(lport->wwpn, &ct->payload.rn.fr_wwn);
+ put_unaligned_be64(lport->wwnn, &ct->payload.rn.fr_wwn);
break;
default: