tty-ldisc: be more careful in 'put_ldisc' locking
Use 'atomic_dec_and_lock()' to make sure that we always hold the
tty_ldisc_lock when the ldisc count goes to zero. That way we can never
race against 'tty_ldisc_try()' increasing the count again.
Reported-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
index be55dfc..1733d34 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -55,25 +55,32 @@
return ld;
}
-static inline void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
+static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ld))
return;
/*
* If this is the last user, free the ldisc, and
* release the ldisc ops.
+ *
+ * We really want an "atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()",
+ * but we don't have it, so this does it by hand.
*/
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ld->users)) {
- unsigned long flags;
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&ld->users, &tty_ldisc_lock)) {
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldo = ld->ops;
- kfree(ld);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ldo->refcount--;
module_put(ldo->owner);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+
+ kfree(ld);
+ return;
}
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/**