sched: Sanitize fork() handling
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do
the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics
in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the
set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork()
Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork()
before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the
task.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ca72ed4..31d9dec 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
- void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
+ void (*task_fork) (struct task_struct *p);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);