x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling
NUMA distance table handling has the following problems.
* numa_reset_distance() uses numa_distance * sizeof(numa_distance[0])
as the table size when it should be using the square of
numa_distance.
* The same size miscalculation when allocation space for phys_dist in
numa_emulation().
* In numa_emulation(), phys_dist must be reserved; otherwise, the new
emulated distance table may overlap it.
Fix them and, while at it, take numa_distance_cnt resetting in
numa_reset_distance() out of the if block to simplify the code a bit.
David Rientjes reported incorrect handling of distance table during
emulation.
-tj: Edited out numa_alloc_distance() related changes which weren't
necessary and rewrote patch description.
-v2: Ingo was unhappy with 80-column limit induced linebreaks. Let
lines run over 80-column.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
2 files changed