cpufreq: interactive: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul()
strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Use kstrtoul() instead.
Otherwise we run into following build error:
CC drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.o
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c: In function ‘store_hispeed_freq’:
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c:784:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strict_strtoul’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.o] Error 1
Change-Id: Ib91b9df3af5fe2a244861c2f598bd20ec8115e6c
Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
index a20ab2e..f2be0d8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
int ret;
long unsigned int val;
- ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
tunables->hispeed_freq = val;
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@
int ret;
unsigned long val;
- ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
tunables->go_hispeed_load = val;
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@
int ret;
unsigned long val;
- ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
tunables->min_sample_time = val;
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@
int ret;
unsigned long val, val_round;
- ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;